High-performance web and Generative Engine Optimization
A rebuild ends with a site you can measure: fast on a mid-range phone, and legible to the tools people now ask before they open a search results page. We read what you have and price it before anything starts.
- Scope
- Rebuild, or a retrieval pass over what you have
- Typical
- Three to six weeks, priced before it starts
- Measured on
- Throttled mobile, not a desktop score
- Start
- Free scope and a fixed price in three business days
FAST Pages built ahead of time, so there is nothing to render on request.
GOOD Core Web Vitals by construction rather than by later tuning.
REACHABLE Priced before it starts, and no platform fee afterwards.
What we build
Pages built before anyone asks for them
Every route is rendered at build time and served as a file. There is no server rendering a template per visit and no framework rehydrating in the browser. JavaScript ships only where something is genuinely interactive, as a small island, which is why the pages stay fast on hardware you did not choose.
Core Web Vitals by construction
Fonts are self-hosted and subset, images are sized so nothing shifts, and the critical path is kept short enough that the largest element paints early. Getting these right at build time is cheaper than tuning them afterward, and they stop regressing once the structure is correct.
Structured so a machine can quote it
Answer-first sections, one question per URL, a coherent heading outline, a JSON-LD entity graph, and an llms.txt summary. Retrieval systems carry a source URL into their answer, so ten pages answering ten questions are ten citable surfaces where one page with ten anchors is one.
How we approach it
Speed and citability are the same problem viewed twice. A page that renders in the browser before it has content is slow for a person and empty for a crawler that does not run JavaScript, so fixing the structure fixes both at once.
We instrument what most agencies cannot. Citation counts are not reported reliably by any vendor yet, so we judge the work on what is actually checkable: field Core Web Vitals from real devices, a valid entity graph, and whether each page answers the question it claims to. Those are the inputs citations follow from, and they are measurable from day one.
Questions on this work
Is Astro actually better for SEO than Next.js?
For content and marketing sites, yes. Astro ships zero JavaScript by default and Next.js does not, and that difference shows up directly in Core Web Vitals on mid-range phones. We pick per project rather than by habit: content-first work goes to Astro, application-heavy work goes to the framework that suits it. Knowing which is which is the part that matters, and it is why these builds score the way they do.
What is Generative Engine Optimization, and does it matter yet?
GEO is structuring a page so AI search tools can read, trust, and quote it: answer-first sections, named entities, JSON-LD, a clear heading outline, and a machine-readable summary. It matters now for considered business purchases, where buyers ask an assistant before they open a search results page. For local and impulse categories, classic search still dominates.
Will a rewrite lose the rankings we already have?
Not if the URLs survive. Rankings attach to addresses, so we keep every existing path or map it with a permanent redirect, carry the titles and descriptions across deliberately rather than regenerating them, and keep the old sitemap live until the new one is indexed. The risky rebuilds are the ones that change the URL structure for tidiness.